From: | Cott Lang <cott(at)internetstaff(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Alternatives to Dell? |
Date: | 2004-12-03 16:55:55 |
Message-ID: | 1102092955.3695.2.camel@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
We were originally heading towards an IBM deployment, but the 325 was
all that was available at the time, and it only supported 12GB. Then
when I heard they canceled their rumored quad processor 350, I feared
Intel/AMD politics and IBM dropped from the running. :)
(IBM now has the 326 that supports 16GB of RAM)
On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 06:38 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Cott Lang wrote:
>
> >Most of mine I got through a Sun reseller. Some of mine I got off of
> >Ebay. You should be able to get them a lot cheaper than than retail web
> >pricing. :)
> >
> >However, even full retail seems like it was a hell of a lot cheaper for
> >a v40z than a DL585. :)
> >
> >
> That's true :) One of the reasons the compaq's are expensive
> is they supposedly use a quad board, even for the dual machine.
> Which means a different opteron chip as well.
>
> I don't know this for a fact, it is just what one of their
> "ahem" sales guys told me.
>
> The IBM machines are seem reasonable though.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>
> >
> >On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 06:30 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Cott Lang wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Consider Sun's new line of Opterons. They've been around for a couple of
> >>>years under the Newisys name. I'm using dozens of them for web servers
> >>>and PG servers and so far both the v20z and v40z have been excellent
> >>>performers with solid reliability. The pricing was also competitive
> >>>since Sun is looking to break into the market.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Really? I am not being sarcastic, but I found their prices pretty sad.
> >>Did you go direct or web purchase? I have thought about using them
> >>several times but....
> >>
> >>Sincerely,
> >>
> >>Joshua D. Drake
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 14:24 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Folks,
> >>>>
> >>>>A lot of people have been having a devilish time with Dell hardware lately.
> >>>>It seems like the quality control just isn't there on the Dell servers.
> >>>>
> >>>>Thing is, some companies are required to use 1st-tier or at least 2nd-tier
> >>>>vendors for hardware; they won't home-build. For those people, what vendors
> >>>>do others on this list recommend? What have been your good/bad experiences?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >>>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pailloncy Jean-Gérard | 2004-12-03 20:38:49 | DB2 feature |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-12-03 14:38:50 | Re: Alternatives to Dell? |