Re: Code documentation

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Gevik Babakhani <gevik(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Code documentation
Date: 2004-12-03 01:18:43
Message-ID: 1102036723.22124.223.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 10:58 +0100, Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> I was wondering if there are any interests or plans for documenting
> various functions in the code which currently are not documented.

I don't know of any systematic effort to do this. I try to document
undocumented code as necessary while making related changes, and I would
imagine other developers do the same.

> I would like to start this discussion to see if we want to do this.

It sounds like a good idea to me. Feel free to submit documentation
patches to the -patches list.

Another area where we could stand to do better is in higher-level
documentation of how the internals of the system work. For example,
something like the Postgres95 Implementation Guide:

http://pluto.iis.nsk.su/postgres95/impl-guide/

but more complete, and up-to-date. There is some documentation in this
vein (such as the README files for specific subsystems), but IMHO we
could do with more.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-12-03 01:20:41 Re: Unicode characters above 0x10000 #2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-12-03 01:16:50 Re: Ready for RC1