From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gevik Babakhani <gevik(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Code documentation |
Date: | 2004-12-03 01:18:43 |
Message-ID: | 1102036723.22124.223.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 10:58 +0100, Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> I was wondering if there are any interests or plans for documenting
> various functions in the code which currently are not documented.
I don't know of any systematic effort to do this. I try to document
undocumented code as necessary while making related changes, and I would
imagine other developers do the same.
> I would like to start this discussion to see if we want to do this.
It sounds like a good idea to me. Feel free to submit documentation
patches to the -patches list.
Another area where we could stand to do better is in higher-level
documentation of how the internals of the system work. For example,
something like the Postgres95 Implementation Guide:
http://pluto.iis.nsk.su/postgres95/impl-guide/
but more complete, and up-to-date. There is some documentation in this
vein (such as the README files for specific subsystems), but IMHO we
could do with more.
-Neil
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-12-03 01:20:41 | Re: Unicode characters above 0x10000 #2 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-12-03 01:16:50 | Re: Ready for RC1 |