Re: New compile warnings for inheritance

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New compile warnings for inheritance
Date: 2004-12-01 23:57:35
Message-ID: 1101945455.22124.128.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 17:22 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I am seeing the following regression failures with CVS head and
> > inheritance tests. They look like sort order problems:
>
> Does it go away if you initdb? I suspect the size of pg_class is a
> factor in the choice of plan for that query. You seem to still be
> getting the old plan ...

I see regression test failures in both inheritence and join (after a
fresh initdb). Attached is the regression.diffs, gzip'ed.

-Neil

Attachment Content-Type Size
regression.diffs.gz application/x-gzip 7.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-12-02 00:56:13 Re: New compile warnings for inheritance
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-12-01 23:44:24 Re: [HACKERS] plperl Safe restrictions