Re: nodeAgg perf tweak

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: nodeAgg perf tweak
Date: 2004-12-01 08:37:21
Message-ID: 1101890241.22124.114.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 08:25 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I'd be a little twitchy about new memory contexts at this stage of beta,
> but if the code is fairly well isolated that could be good.

This would be for 8.1 anyway.

> Would it possible to differentiate between well-known builtin functions
> and added transition functions?

IMHO, this would be ugly and add unnecessary complexity. I'd like to
find a solution that actually fixes the problem, rather than just
working around it in the common case.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-12-01 08:38:56 Re: Increasing the length of
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2004-12-01 08:25:26 Re: nodeAgg perf tweak