Re: -V, --version -- deprecated?

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: -V, --version -- deprecated?
Date: 2004-11-29 04:06:55
Message-ID: 1101701215.22124.27.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 20:25 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> FreeBSD had a problem with double-dash args but I thought that related
> to getopt, and I can't remember how that fits in. Maybe we defined '-'
> in getopt and said it took an argument and tested for '-help' and
> '-verbose', but now we just check argv right inside main. I can't
> remember totally.

ISTM that port/getopt_long.c ought to allow long options to work even if
the platform doesn't provide a getopt_long() itself.

BTW, pg_dump's "-X ..." options seem weird. Why is the "-X" prefix
necessary? ISTM pg_dump would be more consistent with standard
command-line tools if we just provided the long options (such as
--disable-triggers and so on) and did away with the "-X" prefixes.

I'd like to propose these changes:

(1) remove documentation for "-V", declare it deprecated. I don't see
any reason to actually remove it, but this should at least make the
current status quo more consistent.

(2) add documentation for "--help" and "--version" flags, where
appropriate

(3) remove documentation for pg_dump's "-X ..." flags, just document the
--long-option variant. Again, I don't see a need to remove support for
the -X options, but we should declare them deprecated.

Comments?

> Agreed. psql --help certainly looks inconsistent --- only --help and
> --version are long.

Well, perhaps, but I don't think that's a problem (there is no reason
that _every_ command-line flag needs to have both long and short
options).

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-11-29 04:24:02 bug fix request
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-11-29 03:58:43 Re: multiline CSV fields