From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)sitesell(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Parker <dparker(at)tazznetworks(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: time to stop tuning? |
Date: | 2004-11-26 21:48:40 |
Message-ID: | 1101505720.13382.2.camel@home |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> On limiting the client side connections: we've been gradually pushing up
> the client-side connection pool and threads, and have seen steady
> improvement in our throughput up to the current barrier we have reached.
Very well.. Sometimes more simultaneous workers helps, other times it
hinders.
> I've attached the plans for the 4 queries that represent ~35% of our
> load. These are run against the same dataset, but without any other
> load. Another big query basically requires a test to be runnning because
Those aren't likely from your production system as there isn't any data
in those tables and the queries took less than 1ms.
--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)sitesell(dot)com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Casey Allen Shobe | 2004-11-27 02:11:13 | Re: [dspam-users] Postgres vs. MySQL |
Previous Message | Clifton Royston | 2004-11-26 20:35:31 | Re: [dspam-users] Postgres vs. MySQL |