Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Is there a reason why you didn't add TCL_INCLUDE_SPEC to the list in
> PGAC_EVAL_TCLCONFIGSH? It seems that that should handle the missing case
> as well, since
> eval TCL_INCLUDE_SPEC=\"$TCL_INCLUDE_SPEC\"
> should be equivalent to
> TCL_INCLUDE_SPEC=''
> in that case.
I wasn't sure if that would work portably. If you think it will, feel
free to simplify the code.
regards, tom lane