Re: Anyone got time to review an article?

From: Tom Copeland <tom(at)infoether(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
Date: 2004-11-23 18:51:22
Message-ID: 1101235882.20680.193.camel@hal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 13:40, Michael Paesold wrote:
> Tom Copeland wrote:
>
> > This article is up here now:
> >
> > http://databasejournal.com/features/postgresql/article.php/3437821
> >
> > Thanks to Merlin Moncure and Robert Bernier for their helpful
> > suggestions, and long live PostgreSQL!
> What I found quite irritating is that the forum posts below ("PostgreSQL
> Forum") are not about PostgreSQL but really MS SQL, i.e. the MS SQL forum is
> linked into this article. If you look at the available database forums, you
> will see that there is no PostgreSQL forum (but e.g. a MySQL one).
>
> Perhaps you can point that out to the Databasejournal people so the would
> fix it.

Good catch, I've dropped them a line, thanks!

> I liked your article.

Thanks!

Yours,

Tom

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-11-24 04:39:46 Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
Previous Message Michael Paesold 2004-11-23 18:40:31 Re: Anyone got time to review an article?