From: | Robert Fitzpatrick <robert(at)webtent(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Rules WHERE condition |
Date: | 2004-11-17 18:28:16 |
Message-ID: | 1100716095.29305.19.camel@columbus.webtent.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 12:49, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 11:49, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 11:20:41AM -0500, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> >
> > > I have a view that used union all to merge three tables together. I was
> > > hoping to create a rule, one for each table using the WHERE condition of
> > > the rule to determine which table gets updated. Is this possible?
> >
> > See the CREATE RULE documentation:
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/sql-createrule.html
> >
>
> Thanks, that explains a lot, but still not able to get my rule to work,
> this is what I have now:
>
Forget that last post, it is working even though the UPDATE 0 is
returned. The record did update :)
Please someone let me know if you see any issues with that? Like I said,
my first rule let alone with a WHERE condition.
--
Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan Daugherty | 2004-11-17 18:30:16 | User-defined types |
Previous Message | Robert Fitzpatrick | 2004-11-17 17:49:30 | Re: Rules WHERE condition |