Re: code question: storing INTO relation

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: code question: storing INTO relation
Date: 2004-11-14 11:28:12
Message-ID: 1100431692.2950.172.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 23:13, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Greg Stark wrote:
> >> I think that's already done for CREATE INDEX/REINDEX.
>
> > I don't think so. Can someone confirm?
>
> Greg is correct --- at least for btree build, which is the only index
> type we have WAL-ified at all :-(
>

Is there a place (or a single best place) to document this behaviour?
- with each command?
- in the backup section?
- in runtime?

Seems a shame to optimize and not tell anyone.

--
Best Regards, Simon Riggs

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-11-14 11:31:38 Update TIP 9 please
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2004-11-14 11:24:34 Re: postmaster segfaults with HUGE table