Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Subject: Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Date: 2009-01-16 20:10:40
Message-ID: 11003.1232136640@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Is the bare form (no U or S) going to search all schemas or the ones
> on the search path? Whatever the answer, do we need a way to get the
> other?

The former, if you specify "*.*" (or "*.anything") as your pattern.
The latter, if you don't specify a schema qualifier in your pattern.
This already works and has since 7.3; I don't think we need to embed
any such semantics in the command names.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-01-16 20:16:56 Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-01-16 20:09:35 Re: Hot Standby dev build (v8)