Re: DROP DATABASE, but still there

From: Robert Fitzpatrick <robert(at)webtent(dot)com>
To: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DROP DATABASE, but still there
Date: 2004-11-11 19:17:45
Message-ID: 1100200665.11257.34.camel@columbus.webtent.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 14:03, Doug McNaught wrote:
> Robert Fitzpatrick <robert(at)webtent(dot)com> writes:
>
> > What does it mean when you drop a database and then recreate with the
> > same name and all the objects are still there. I want to wipe out the db
> > and put back from pg_restore. After I re-create the db, all the old
> > tables are back before I run pg_restore.
>
> Check the 'template1' database to see if the tables got put in there
> by mistake at some point.

Yeah, I was just starting to realize that these objects that keep coming
back are in the template1 as well.....any reason why I shouldn't drop
the template1 and re-create like any other?

--
Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Larard 2004-11-11 19:29:33 Re: implicit casting problem
Previous Message jao 2004-11-11 19:17:41 When to switch to Postgres 8.0?