| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
| Date: | 2004-11-09 18:10:09 |
| Message-ID: | 1100023808.4442.198.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 16:33, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 9. November 2004 16:47 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> > I have been asked about why there is no single preferred Replication
> > Solution etc...; I said it was the nature of the development community
> > that many ideas are allowed out at once.
>
> What are the other solutions?
The press release additional information says
Replication:
Slony-I
pgReplicator
eRServer
...though there are I think 2? other web pages/codesets out there that
claim to work with PostgreSQL also..
--
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-11-09 18:17:33 | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-11-09 18:06:13 | Re: Final Copy Edit: Press Release, Page |