From: | "Creager, Robert S" <CreagRS(at)LOUISVILLE(dot)STORTEK(dot)COM> |
---|---|
To: | "'Doug McNaught'" <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: question about indexing. |
Date: | 2001-10-01 18:57:52 |
Message-ID: | 10FE17AD5F7ED31188CE002048406DE8514EA9@lsv-msg06.stortek.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hey Doug,
Hmmm... I just re-did two columns in a table from float4 from float8 'cause
the index was never used when executing a query. I'm guessing that the
values from the select were used as a float8 then? Thanks for the hint.
Later,
Rob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug McNaught [mailto:doug(at)wireboard(dot)com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 7:36 PM
> To: Brian Hirt
> Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org; Brian A Hirt
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] question about indexing.
>
>
> "Brian Hirt" <bhirt(at)mobygames(dot)com> writes:
>
> > I have a table with about 1 million rows in it. One of the
> columns in this
> > table is some sort of status (it's an int2). Out of the
> million rows, only
> > about 100 of the rows have a status that is not like the rest.
>
> > Yes, i do vacuum the table.
> >
> > Does anyone know how to avoid all these table scans?
>
> Cast the value you're testing against in the query to int2
> and you may
> see an improvement. The planner isn't currently smart enough to
> realize it can use the index when the test value in the query is an
> int4.
>
> -Doug
> --
> In a world of steel-eyed death, and men who are fighting to be warm,
> Come in, she said, I'll give you shelter from the storm. -Dylan
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cary Lewis | 2001-10-01 19:35:09 | windows ce version of postgresql |
Previous Message | Keary Suska | 2001-10-01 18:49:23 | Re: Extracting time |