From: | Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Cc: | Travis P <twp(at)castle(dot)fastmail(dot)fm>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, barwick(at)gmail(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |
Date: | 2004-11-06 00:17:59 |
Message-ID: | 1099700279.2634.5.camel@teetnang |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
В Птн, 05.11.2004, в 21:40, Heikki Linnakangas пишет:
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Travis P wrote:
>
> > Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >> Interestingly, the subversion repository is 585MB, and the CVS repository
> > is only 260MB,
> >
> > BDB or FSFS back-end? FSFS seems to require less space. (The BDB backend
> > tends to pre-allocate space though, so maybe there was a big jump, but then
> > growth will slow markedly, so making a comparison for a repository that will
> > continue to grow is difficult.)
>
> BDB.
Here's what the subversion book has to say about that:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/svnbook-1.1/ch05.html#svn-ch-5-sect-1.2.A
We use svn over ssh and recently switched to fsfs because of the umask
problem and because read-only access to bdb causes writes to the
database.
--
Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joachim Wieland | 2004-11-06 00:54:26 | Re: Documentation on PITR still scarce |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-11-05 22:26:55 | Re: Documentation on PITR still scarce |