From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Vlad <marchenko(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, dbdpg-general(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 'prepare' is not quite schema-safe |
Date: | 2005-05-02 05:44:33 |
Message-ID: | 10989.1115012673@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Vlad <marchenko(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> so is it possible that a successfully prepared (and possibly a couple
> of times already executed) query will be invalidated by postgresql
> for some reason (like lack of memory for processing/caching other
> queries)? Assuming that no database structure changes has been
> performed.
Well, that assumption is wrong to start with: what if the query plan
uses an index that someone else has chosen to drop? Or the plan
depends on an inlined copy of a SQL function that someone has since
changed? Or the plan was chosen on the basis of particular settings
of planner parameters like random_page_cost, but the user has changed
these via SET? (The last is a pretty close analogy to changing
search_path, I think.)
I am not claiming that the backend handles all these cases nicely
today: it certainly doesn't. But we understand in principle how
to fix these problems by invalidating plans inside the backend.
I don't see how the DBD::Pg driver can hope to deal with any of
these situations :-(
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Smith | 2005-05-02 05:45:09 | Re: success with p2p ip connection |
Previous Message | Vlad | 2005-05-02 05:05:45 | Re: 'prepare' is not quite schema-safe |