From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: additional GCC warning flags |
Date: | 2004-10-20 02:32:33 |
Message-ID: | 1098239553.29787.5.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 02:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> Looks reasonable to me. Just one comment: should the
> -fno-strict-aliasing probe be inside the "if test "$GCC" = yes" part?
> It effectively was in the original.
Yeah, makes sense. Patch applied with this fix and Peter's suggested
improvement to a comment.
> > BTW, since we're on the topic of compiler options, is there a reason we
> > don't use -g3 with GCC when --enable-debug is specified? It seems worth
> > using to me.
>
> How much does it bloat the executable?
Quite a bit, as it turns out: with CFLAGS="-O2 -g, "postgres" is 7077111
bytes. With CFLAGS="-O2 -g3", "postgres" is 51227279 bytes. So there is
quite an increase -- I guess we had better stick with -g then.
-Neil
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-10-20 02:52:57 | Re: Possible make_oidjoins_check Security Issue |
Previous Message | Reini Urban | 2004-10-20 01:07:05 | Re: Where is the link to cygwin? |