From: | Robin Ericsson <robin(dot)ericsson(at)profecta(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | query problem |
Date: | 2004-10-13 09:21:11 |
Message-ID: | 1097659271.24018.68.camel@pylver.localhost.nu. |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Hi,
I sent this to general earlier but I was redirected to performance.
The query have been running ok for quite some time, but after I did a
vacuum on the database, it's very very slow. This IN-query is only 2
ids. Before the problem that in was a subselect-query returning around
6-7 ids. The tables included in the query are described in database.txt.
status=# select count(id) from data;
count
---------
1577621
(1 row)
status=# select count(data_id) from data_values;
count
---------
9680931
(1 row)
I did run a new explain analyze on the query and found the attached
result. The obvious problem I see is a full index scan in
"idx_dv_data_id". I tried dropping and adding the index again, thats why
is't called "idx_data_values_data_id" in the dump.
status=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE
status-# SELECT
status-# data.entered,
status-# data.machine_id,
status-# datatemplate_intervals.template_id,
status-# data_values.value
status-# FROM
status-# data, data_values, datatemplate_intervals
status-# WHERE
status-# datatemplate_intervals.id = data_values.template_id AND
status-# data_values.data_id = data.id AND
status-# data.machine_id IN (2,3) AND
status-# current_timestamp::timestamp - interval '60 seconds' <
data.entered;
Regards,
Robin
--
Robin Ericsson <robin(dot)ericsson(at)profecta(dot)se>
Profecta HB
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
explain2.txt | text/plain | 1.2 KB |
database.txt | text/plain | 2.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-13 09:36:53 | Re: [GENERAL] Reusable pl/pgsql samples ? |
Previous Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2004-10-13 09:08:49 | Re: adding two tables |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ken | 2004-10-13 14:37:43 | Re: query problem |
Previous Message | CoL | 2004-10-13 08:46:59 | Re: Which plattform do you recommend I run PostgreSQL for best |