Re: Unit testing

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unit testing
Date: 2004-10-12 00:32:43
Message-ID: 1097541162.14940.41.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 00:43, Tom Lane wrote:
> Most likely (and I for one will for sure resist any attempt to force
> global uniqueness on static names).

You're right that the issue can be avoided easily enough, but what need
is there _not_ to have globally unique function names?

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2004-10-12 00:39:12 Re: Unit testing
Previous Message Reini Urban 2004-10-11 23:42:34 Re: [HACKERS] open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore