Re: How to make PG use work_mem?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Torsten Förtsch <torsten(dot)foertsch(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How to make PG use work_mem?
Date: 2014-03-11 13:36:04
Message-ID: 10972.1394544964@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torsten_F=F6rtsch?= <torsten(dot)foertsch(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I have a query that involves an external sort:

> -> Sort (cost=13662680.01..13850498.48 rows=75127389 width=16)
> (actual time=980098.397..1021411.862 rows=74181544 loops=1)
> Sort Key: (ROW(account_id, (purchase_time)::date))
> Sort Method: external merge Disk: 3118088kB
> Buffers: shared hit=1568637 read=1327223,
> temp read=389763 written=389763

> What puzzles me is that this happens even when I set work_mem to 50GB in
> the session.

> Why does it still use the external merge?

Seems odd. I wouldn't have been surprised if you'd said it didn't do it
at work_mem = 5GB. The internal memory requirement can be noticeably
larger than the space required on-disk, mainly because we go to some
lengths to minimize the size of sort tuples when writing them out, but
not if they stay in memory. But a difference of more than maybe 2X to
3X from that effect would be surprising.

Perhaps you fat-fingered the SET somehow?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message nill 2014-03-11 14:13:01 Re: Extracting data from the view to retrieve the foreign key is not declared
Previous Message Igor Neyman 2014-03-11 13:20:19 Re: Increase in max_connections