| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "Hiroshi Saito" <saito(at)inetrt(dot)skcapi(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CVS of 8.1.x MS-VC6 probrem. |
| Date: | 2005-12-09 14:33:07 |
| Message-ID: | 10970.1134138787@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> As one of the people who has had the joy of maintaining this in the
> past, I wanted to drop it as you may remember but that was rejected on
> the basis that someone somewhere might want to use their own VC++ build
> over our precompiled versions for some reason.
> Now that there is a project on pgFoundry allowing builds of the entire
> server using VC++, perhaps we should rethink that decision?
I recall wanting to drop it too. Wasn't the argument about whether the
libpq.dll we produce would work nicely in a VC++ project? If it does,
then I'm willing to push the problem off to the pgFoundry project.
(Of course that would be a change for 8.2, not something we should drop
in existing branches.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Saito | 2005-12-09 14:34:22 | Re: CVS of 8.1.x MS-VC6 probrem. |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-12-09 14:21:28 | Re: CVS of 8.1.x MS-VC6 probrem. |