Re: semicolon not required on END statement

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hussein Patni <security(at)cosbit(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: semicolon not required on END statement
Date: 2004-10-01 04:53:28
Message-ID: 1096606408.9055.1.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 13:46, Tom Lane wrote:
> We specifically do not require a semicolon at the very end of the
> function definition.

Yeah, makes sense. Attached is a doc patch. Barring any objections I'll
apply it to HEAD by end-of-day today.

-Neil

Attachment Content-Type Size
plpgsql-end-semicolon-doc-1.patch text/x-patch 851 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2004-10-01 05:07:34 Re: PLPGSQL and FOUND stange behaviour after EXECUTE
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-01 03:46:52 Re: semicolon not required on END statement