| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 |
| Date: | 2004-10-01 00:53:56 |
| Message-ID: | 1096592036.25277.432.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 19:28, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 05:52, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I don't think we can do that in a standard function, at least not
> > without a lot of work.
>
> Can you elaborate on why this would be so difficult?
I never got a reply to this question -- someone, anyone?
(BTW, Gavin and I are working through the suggestions for changes to the
stored procedure proposal -- we'll send a revised spec to the list next
week. Thanks for the feedback, everyone.)
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-01 00:55:20 | Re: AIX and V8 beta 3 |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2004-10-01 00:27:26 | Re: Reviving Time Travel (was Re: 'TID index') |