Re: Auto-increment serial (Postgresql JDBC driver w/

From: "Jaroslaw J(dot) Pyszny" <arghil(at)poczta(dot)onet(dot)pl>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com, pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Auto-increment serial (Postgresql JDBC driver w/
Date: 2004-09-28 15:37:50
Message-ID: 1096385869.15887.11.camel@lx.siec
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

W liscie z czw, 23-09-2004, godz. 07:40, Kris Jurka pisze:
> >

> 1) With the addition of the new types, should we only return true for
> AUTO_INCREMENT on the serial types and not the integer types?
OK

> 2) Is it necessary to return all four versions of the types (serial,
> serial4, bigserial, and serial8)? To me this seems to just add confusion
> and perhaps we should just pick a pair of these to use.
Only serial and bigserial ?

> 3) If we are going to add these as valid types, it seems we should alter
> DatabaseMetaData.getColumns to return "serial" for the TYPE_NAME column as
> well.
Ok

Jarek
--
8 \\|||// Jarosław J. Pyszny <arghil(at)poczta(dot)onet(dot)pl>
b (o|o) Linux admin/devel ("Vitae,non scholae,discimus")
i --\_/-- Linux user: #96704 (http://counter.li.org)
t =->computers - let me know if you want to get rid of it <-=

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2004-09-29 01:42:54 Re: Connection Port?
Previous Message Chris Helm 2004-09-28 15:31:52 Connection Port?