From: | "Jaroslaw J(dot) Pyszny" <arghil(at)poczta(dot)onet(dot)pl> |
---|---|
To: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
Cc: | pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com, pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Auto-increment serial (Postgresql JDBC driver w/ |
Date: | 2004-09-28 15:37:50 |
Message-ID: | 1096385869.15887.11.camel@lx.siec |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
W liscie z czw, 23-09-2004, godz. 07:40, Kris Jurka pisze:
> >
> 1) With the addition of the new types, should we only return true for
> AUTO_INCREMENT on the serial types and not the integer types?
OK
> 2) Is it necessary to return all four versions of the types (serial,
> serial4, bigserial, and serial8)? To me this seems to just add confusion
> and perhaps we should just pick a pair of these to use.
Only serial and bigserial ?
> 3) If we are going to add these as valid types, it seems we should alter
> DatabaseMetaData.getColumns to return "serial" for the TYPE_NAME column as
> well.
Ok
Jarek
--
8 \\|||// Jarosław J. Pyszny <arghil(at)poczta(dot)onet(dot)pl>
b (o|o) Linux admin/devel ("Vitae,non scholae,discimus")
i --\_/-- Linux user: #96704 (http://counter.li.org)
t =->computers - let me know if you want to get rid of it <-=
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2004-09-29 01:42:54 | Re: Connection Port? |
Previous Message | Chris Helm | 2004-09-28 15:31:52 | Connection Port? |