Re: Others applying patch queue patches

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Others applying patch queue patches
Date: 2004-09-21 03:01:00
Message-ID: 1095735660.8747.223.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 13:18, Tom Lane wrote:
> In my mind this is just a clearer statement of what the policy always
> was ;-). The patch review/application load was never supposed to fall
> entirely on Bruce. The list he maintains is just there to ensure that
> nothing slips through the cracks.

Sounds good. Before I apply a patch from -patches, I send a mail saying
"I intend to apply the patch in xyz hours", or the like. Is the presence
of the patch on Bruce's pending patches list sufficient notice that it
is going to be applied, or should I send mail in this case as well?

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2004-09-21 03:03:35 Re: [HACKERS] RSS
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2004-09-21 01:38:02 Re: signal 11 on AIX: 7.4.2