From: | mudfoot(at)rawbw(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Tryint to match Solaris-Oracle performance with directio? |
Date: | 2004-09-18 01:22:43 |
Message-ID: | 1095470563.414b8de381c99@webmail.rawbw.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
I fully agree with Gaetano about testing sync methods. From testing I've done
on two different Solaris 8 boxes, the O_DSYNC option on Solaris 8 beats fsync
and fdatasync easily. Test it yourself though. There's probably some
opportuntiy there for better performance for you.
> > BTW this is Postgres 7.4.1, and our customers are Solaris 8 and 9.
>
> If you care your data upgrade to more recent 7.4.5
>
> Test your better sync method using /src/tools/fsync however do some
> experiment changing the sync method, you can also avoid to update the
> acces time for the inodes mounting the partition with noatime option
> ( this however have more impact on performance for read activities )
>
>
> Regards
> Gaetano Mendola
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-09-18 16:35:50 | Re: Tryint to match Solaris-Oracle performance with directio? |
Previous Message | Stephen Crowley | 2004-09-18 00:23:44 | Re: Large # of rows in query extremely slow, not using |