From: | "Jeffrey W(dot) Baker" <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: disk performance benchmarks |
Date: | 2004-09-15 18:36:18 |
Message-ID: | 1095273378.9384.0.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 10:53, Vivek Khera wrote:
> >>>>> "JWB" == Jeffrey W Baker <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
>
> JWB> All these replies are really interesting, but the point is not that my
> JWB> RAIDs are too slow, or that my CPUs are too slow. My point is that, for
> JWB> long stretches of time, by database doesn't come anywhere near using the
> JWB> capacity of the hardware. And I think that's odd and would like to
> JWB> config it to "false".
>
> Have you tried to increase your checkpoing_segments? I get the
> suspicion that you're checkpointing every 3 minutes constantly.
> You'll have to restart the postmaster for this setting to take effect,
> I believe.
I have checkpoint_segments set to 24, but I get the feeling that making
it larger may have the opposite effect of what I want, by extending the
period during which the DB makes no progress.
-jwb
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Donald | 2004-09-15 18:36:27 | Re: division by zero issue |
Previous Message | John Sidney-Woollett | 2004-09-15 18:33:09 | Re: psql + autocommit |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-09-15 18:47:39 | Re: disk performance benchmarks |
Previous Message | Ron St-Pierre | 2004-09-15 17:55:21 | Re: [GENERAL] disk performance benchmarks |