From: | Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Dexter <MDEXTER(at)dexterchaney(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Creating Functions in Separate Schema |
Date: | 2004-08-27 05:37:08 |
Message-ID: | 1093585028.1520.110.camel@Andrea.peacock.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Mark,
Am Do, den 26.08.2004 schrieb Mark Dexter um 23:42:
> Our application currently runs in Microsoft SQL Server and we are
> porting it over to Postgres. When we write enbedded SQL queries for
> SQL Server, we need to reference user-defined functions with the
> prefix "dbo." (e.g., "dbo.Function_Name()"). In experimenting with
> Postgres, it appears that we can create a schema called "dbo" and then
> reference functions with the same syntax (e.g.,
> "dbo.Function_Name()").
>
> We're trying to understand whether there will be any disadvantages to
> doing this. Are there any possible issues or problems with this
> approach? Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
>
This is generally not a problem. The search order
depends on the current user, so if there is a schema
with same name as the current user, its the first to search
in (and the one to put new objects in) but if you
always specify the schema name with your objects you
should not expect any problems and can use as many
schemas you want.
Regards
Tino Wildenhain
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2004-08-27 06:10:15 | Re: performance of IN (subquery) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-27 05:00:21 | Re: owner orphaned databases |