From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | AJ Weber <aweber(at)comcast(dot)net>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Partition table in 9.0.x? |
Date: | 2013-01-08 17:51:40 |
Message-ID: | 10931.1357667500@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:45 AM, AJ Weber <aweber(at)comcast(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>> \d+ doesn't appear to display any size information.
> It does if you use it without an argument, to display all the tables
> in the search path:
> jjanes=# \d+
> List of relations
> Schema | Name | Type | Owner | Size | Description
> --------+------------------+-------+--------+---------+-------------
> public | pgbench_accounts | table | jjanes | 128 MB |
> public | pgbench_branches | table | jjanes | 40 kB |
> public | pgbench_history | table | jjanes | 0 bytes |
> public | pgbench_tellers | table | jjanes | 40 kB |
> (4 rows)
> It rather annoys me that you actually get less information (no size,
> no owner) when you use \d+ on a named table. I don't know if there is
> a reason for that feature, or if it was just an oversight.
This is actually an abbreviation for \dtisv+, which is a completely
different command from "\d table". You can use something like
"\dt+ table-pattern" to get a display of the above form for a subset
of tables. I agree it ain't too consistent.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | AJ Weber | 2013-01-08 18:04:55 | Re: Partition table in 9.0.x? |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-01-08 17:21:42 | Re: Partition table in 9.0.x? |