| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Removing pg_auth_members.grantor (was Grantor name gets lost when grantor role dropped) |
| Date: | 2007-05-04 21:31:50 |
| Message-ID: | 10924.1178314310@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> Hmm. I'm not sure, but that may have been a case where it was generally
> decided that the spec was somewhat braindead in this fashion (it seems
> so in my personal view of this, honestly...). To issue a revoke and
> have it not work would be kind of concerning. If we do end up following
> this path we should emit a warning (at least...) if the user still has
> the rights which are being revoked, even if through someone else.
That's not how it works for rights on ordinary objects.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ennio-Sr | 2007-05-04 21:52:18 | Re: order by question. |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2007-05-04 20:54:07 | Re: Removing pg_auth_members.grantor (was Grantor name gets lost when grantor role dropped) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-04 21:39:25 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Teach tuplesort.c about "top N" sorting, in which only the first |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2007-05-04 20:54:07 | Re: Removing pg_auth_members.grantor (was Grantor name gets lost when grantor role dropped) |