From: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon(at)thenilgiris(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: reply to setting |
Date: | 2004-08-11 21:18:35 |
Message-ID: | 1092259114.16087.80.camel@jester |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
> > faster than ones sent through the lists. It is also possible that the direct
> > replies might be handled differently by the recipient (e.g. a filter may put
> > them in different folders).
>
> This is very true. In fact, I get mildly annoyed when people *don't*
> include the direct reply to me, because I very actively filter/redirect
If you don't want duplicates, send an email to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
with the following command (or something similar to this anyway):
set pgsql-hackers eliminatecc
Whenever you're in the To: or Cc: headers, the list will not send you a
copy of the message -- so you only receive it once.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-08-11 22:18:59 | Re: Wierded error in recursive function; debugging ideas? |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2004-08-11 20:45:21 | Re: reply to setting |