From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Richard Welty <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 Feature List? |
Date: | 2004-08-11 17:51:49 |
Message-ID: | 1092246710.8616.2310.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 07:51, Richard Welty wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 03:17:00 -0600 Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)qwest(dot)net> wrote:
> > Plus, there are
> > currently no replication systems for postgresql that are all things to
> > all people,
>
> is this even possible?
>
> (no, don't answer that, it's a rhetorical question.)
>
> i can make a case that there are at least 3 distinctly different types
> of replication needed depending on the application.
>
> 1) synchronous
>
> 2) single master, multiple slave asynchronous
> (aka slony)
>
> 3) multi-master async w/conflict resolution
> (like the now woefully out of date pg-replicator)
>
> the work on slony is appreciated, but i need 3), and it
> looks like i'm going to have to do it myself. sigh.
>
On the upside, you have already been given pg-replicator as a starting
point, all you need to do is being it up to speed.
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matt Van Mater | 2004-08-11 18:24:59 | disabling autocommit |
Previous Message | Eugene Barlow | 2004-08-11 17:41:28 | boolean function return values |