Re: indexes on primary and foreign keys

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: K C Lau <kclau60(at)netvigator(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: indexes on primary and foreign keys
Date: 2006-01-12 04:45:49
Message-ID: 1092.1137041149@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

K C Lau <kclau60(at)netvigator(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks. The side effect is that it would suppress other notices which might
> be useful.

There's been some discussion of subdividing the present "notice"
category into two subclasses, roughly defined as "only novices wouldn't
know this" and "maybe this is interesting". What's missing at this
point is a concrete proposal as to which existing NOTICE messages should
go into each category. If you feel like tackling the project, go for it...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-01-12 09:48:41 Re: Extremely irregular query performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-01-12 04:33:23 Re: Stable function being evaluated more than once in a single query