| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ipcclean in 8.1 broken? |
| Date: | 2006-03-01 15:46:05 |
| Message-ID: | 10913.1141227965@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> No-one has a comment on this?
ipcclean has never been much more than beta-quality software; it doesn't
pretend to be very portable.
Having said that, I think the anti-root check is bogus. It was probably
added in a fit of "let's make sure nobody tries to admin PG as root",
but I don't see why that applies to ipcclean. The only thing that
really matters is whether the subsequent id/whoami lookup comes up with
the proper user id. I'd be inclined to do the id lookup and then bomb
out if it came up with 0 (just to ensure that no one accidentally blows
away really-important shared memory segments).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-03-01 15:48:05 | statement_cost_limit |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-01 15:39:00 | Re: Initdb on Windows 2003 |