| From: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Boes <jboes(at)qtm(dot)net> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Inherited tables and new fields | 
| Date: | 2004-07-21 07:11:27 | 
| Message-ID: | 1090393887.25749.164.camel@linda | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql | 
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 15:36, Jeff Boes wrote:
...
> Of course, had we used table inheritance, we'd do something like ...
> 
>    select * from draft_template ...
> 
> but it wouldn't do exactly what we are doing now: that is,
> fn_all_drafts() returns not only the contents of every row in the tables
> draft_XXXXX, but also an extra column indicating which table that row
> came from.
You can do that with an inheritance hierarchy like this:
select tableoid::regclass as tablename, * from my_table;
>    create table all_drafts (editor_id integer) inherits draft_template;
> 
> What frustrates me from time to time is that if "draft_template" is
> altered to add a new column, then the function breaks because the new
> column appears in "all_drafts" as *following* editor_id. The column
> order messes up the code in the function, because it's expecting
> all_drafts to look like draft_template, with editor_id added at the end.
> 
> Is this a mis-feature?
New columns get added at the end of each table; that is standard.
-- 
Oliver Elphick                                          olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight                              http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/A54310EA  92C8 39E7 280E 3631 3F0E  1EC0 5664 7A2F A543 10EA
                 ========================================
     "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay 
      down his life for his friends."      John 15:13 
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-07-21 07:30:17 | Re: surrogate key or not? | 
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-07-21 07:00:59 | Re: surrogate key or not? |