Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Travers <chris(at)verkiel(dot)metatrontech(dot)com>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com>, Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Aly S(dot)P Dharshi" <aly(dot)dharshi(at)telus(dot)net>, "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas
Date: 2005-10-16 22:38:24
Message-ID: 10901.1129502304@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Chris Travers <chris(at)verkiel(dot)metatrontech(dot)com> writes:
> I make the following assumptions:

> 1) All backend references to identifiers are treated as quoted by the
> backend as mentioned in a previous thread.
> 2) Same with official clients like psql.
> 3) We don't guarantee complete backward compatibility in the system
> catalogs anyway (note that this is a trivial problem to solve if 1 above
> is solved-- schemas, views, and rules can accomplish some cool tricks
> :-) ).

None of these assumptions are acceptable, particularly not #2. In
reality #2 is a proxy for "I'm willing to break all existing clients
that look at the system catalogs". Which we're not.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martín Marqués 2005-10-16 23:12:10 Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-10-16 21:25:52 Re: Oracle buys Innobase