Re: Invalidate the subscription worker in cases where a user loses their superuser status

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Invalidate the subscription worker in cases where a user loses their superuser status
Date: 2023-09-28 17:52:33
Message-ID: 1089c63b65eda736d5c6e9ddbf64cfbe65017373.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 11:34 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I guess it depends on whether we think this is a bug. I think you
> could argue it either way.

I'd suggest backporting to 16 unless there's some kind of difficulty.
Otherwise we have a minor difference in behavior for no reason.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Moench-Tegeder 2023-09-28 17:59:08 Re: wal recycling problem
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2023-09-28 16:06:21 Re: bug: ANALYZE progress report with inheritance tables