| From: | Robby Russell <robby(at)planetargon(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jerry LeVan <jerry(dot)levan(at)eku(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Loading Binary Data into Bytea Fields? |
| Date: | 2004-07-07 14:27:23 |
| Message-ID: | 1089210443.3037.155.camel@vacant |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 05:12, Jerry LeVan wrote:
> Objective C via Libpq, the thumbnails are not going to be very big.
>
> Large objects seem a bit out of place and require extra care
> when backing up and doing deletions....
>
> Jerry
Well, from my experience large objects are faster than bytea.
Also, some info on the main 3-4 different options:
http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/25.html (look under the
heading, "storing images in database"
One method that they mentiond was storing them in a text field with
Base-64 encoding, as this would allow you to export/import/talk with
other databases (mysql, ...) should that be required in your
environment.
cheers,
-Robby
--
Robby Russell | Owner.Developer.Geek
PLANET ARGON | www.planetargon.com
Portland, OR | robby(at)planetargon(dot)com
503.351.4730 | blog.planetargon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-07-07 14:35:53 | Re: Error in postgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Kaarel | 2004-07-07 13:43:47 | Re: [GENERAL] Do we need more emphasis on backup? |