From: | mike g <mike(at)thegodshalls(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: LIKE and encoding and locale |
Date: | 2004-06-24 04:59:09 |
Message-ID: | 1088053148.3650.7.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I take that back... I was thinking of Upper/Lower in Unicode. Sorry for
the possible misinfo.
mike g wrote:
> Yes there are. Tom the Magi has come up with a patch for that I
> believe. Search the hackers mailing list but I think it has a shot at
> making it in 7.5
>
> Mike
> On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 23:18, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> > I found this thread on the general list about 2 months ago:
> >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=postgresql-general&m=108271530922498&w=2
> >
> > Is there any plans to make unicode more usable for sorting, LIKE, and LOCALE in the future? Reading that thread, and all the manuals, it seems that unicode is very limited; It really only works in one langauge in a database. So in reality, it'd just be simpler to use an 8 bit encoding on any postgres database, and a new database for each and every langauge that needs to be used by a company/site, if I have understood all the implications.
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dennis Gearon | 2004-06-24 05:15:08 | clusters and database instances |
Previous Message | mike g | 2004-06-24 04:43:22 | Re: LIKE and encoding and locale |