From: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Donnacha Mac Gloinn <postgresql(dot)org(at)donnacha(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: |
Date: | 2004-06-22 22:41:39 |
Message-ID: | 1087944098.86545.116.camel@jester |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> Financially, vB are riding high at the moment, have the best product in
> their field and don't feel under any immediate pressure to pursue the
> long-term advantages that PostgreSQL could offer. That's understandable
> but frustrating for those of us who are thinking ahead, which is why I
> wrote the following response:
Funnily enough, lack of PostgreSQL support is the reason why we chose to
go with another BB software rather than vB. Maintenance of a MySQL
installation just for the BB software wasn't worth it.
So, whether they want to acknowledge it or not, they're not the best
product in their field for some.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Donnacha Mac Gloinn | 2004-06-22 22:45:47 | Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity:VbulletinForum |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-06-22 22:07:58 | Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum |