Re: #postgresql report

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: #postgresql report
Date: 2004-06-15 16:43:42
Message-ID: 1087317821.12015.31.camel@stromboli
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 16:05, Jeff wrote:
> Don't forget we get people nearly daily who are encountering problems
> because Debian stable ships with 7.2. We've grown accustomed to giving
> 7.4 (or at least 7.3) advice and often those things don't work on 7.2.
> (such as information_schema and set returning functions)
>

There is an argument there for splitting the support lists so that each
main release has its own channel. That way, advice will always be
appropriate to the release...

Also, we can add messages to the bottom appropriate to that release.

For example, tip #9 is set to be obsolete in 7.5, but its still much
needed advice for anybody below that level.

That would also remind people to upgrade??

Just and idea...

Best regards, Simon Riggs

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bowlby 2004-06-15 16:55:02 pg_restore recovery from error.
Previous Message Pierre Emmanuel Gros 2004-06-15 16:24:22 Re: constraint upon view