From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] The pgreplication project |
Date: | 2004-06-08 15:49:32 |
Message-ID: | 1086709772.29252.1155.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Well I am working to address the problem, sorry if I am not doing it
fast enough. I spoke with the gborg maintainer and found out that the
top 5 is based on page views for a project rather than cvs activity.
While I've no doubt you've been more active on slony development, I am
not so sure that pgreplication doesn't get more page views. So, I have
(just) sent Chris an email asking to reset the stats so we will see
which project floats to the top, but I think longer term we need a
"replication guide" listing the different solutions available like we do
with windows and gui tools up on techdocs. I plan to do that as well,
just need to find time to work it into the schedule.
Robert Treat
On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 08:46, Jan Wieck wrote:
> I guess I have to address a slightly broader audience, or do I conclude
> from the total lack of interest in this matter that nobody cares if we
> promote something here as one of our "top five" flagship projects, that
> is inactive for years and still a prototype implementation against
> PostgreSQL 6.4 with no ideas how to incorporate the semantic changes of
> MVCC into the concept.
>
> We might be leaning towards migrating things to pgfoundry, but that does
> not mean that we can leave gborg behind as a half plundered wreck where
> one by accident might still find something useful.
>
>
> Jan
>
>
> On 6/4/2004 8:01 AM, Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > on the gborg front page is a link to the "pgreplication" project as one
> > of five "top" projects. This thing has had zero updates since its last
> > attempts agains PostgreSQL 7.2 and appears literally dead.
> >
> > Can someone please remove that?
> >
> >
> > Jan
> >
>
>
> --
> #======================================================================#
> # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
> # Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
> #================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-06-08 15:55:38 | Re: [GENERAL] The pgreplication project |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-06-08 15:34:27 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] The pgreplication project |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-06-08 15:55:38 | Re: [GENERAL] The pgreplication project |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-06-08 15:34:27 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] The pgreplication project |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-06-08 15:55:38 | Re: [GENERAL] The pgreplication project |
Previous Message | pgsql | 2004-06-08 15:46:38 | Re: sequences and "addval('myseq', value)" |