Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature.
Date: 2018-03-31 15:58:34
Message-ID: 1086.1522511914@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On March 31, 2018 8:43:37 AM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I don't want to waste cycles on testing docs when I'm trying
>> to test code, any more than I would like the reverse (ie forcing a docs
>> build to build code too).

> They're a local check target in the docs directory. But it just checks
> postgres.xml, not additional targets. Don't think anybody proposed to
> add the doc check to the top-level check target.

Ah, didn't realize that "make check" in the docs isn't connected up to
the main check target. As long as that's true, no objection.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-03-31 16:27:44 Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature.
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-03-31 15:46:18 Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2018-03-31 16:13:09 Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-03-31 15:53:22 Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries