From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature. |
Date: | 2018-03-31 15:58:34 |
Message-ID: | 1086.1522511914@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On March 31, 2018 8:43:37 AM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I don't want to waste cycles on testing docs when I'm trying
>> to test code, any more than I would like the reverse (ie forcing a docs
>> build to build code too).
> They're a local check target in the docs directory. But it just checks
> postgres.xml, not additional targets. Don't think anybody proposed to
> add the doc check to the top-level check target.
Ah, didn't realize that "make check" in the docs isn't connected up to
the main check target. As long as that's true, no objection.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-03-31 16:27:44 | Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature. |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-03-31 15:46:18 | Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2018-03-31 16:13:09 | Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-03-31 15:53:22 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries |