Re: plperl warning

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl warning
Date: 2005-07-10 21:42:04
Message-ID: 10852.1121031724@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> . I am seeing LOTS of warnings (not for plperl) about mismatched
> signedness of things

Yeah, the multibyte code is just full of places where "char *" is passed
to "unsigned char *" or vice versa. It's harmless, but on compilers
that warn about that (which includes the latest gcc releases) it's
pretty annoying. Sometime we'll have to clean it up.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-07-11 00:10:24 Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-07-10 21:29:32 Re: plperl warning