Re: patch for getUDT

While we don't support JAVA_OBJECT we do support struct, and distinct.

Dave
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 18:41, Kris Jurka wrote:
> On Thu, 13 May 2004, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> > Here's a patch for getUDT, I'll apply it if nobody complains..
> >
>
> It seems to have some problems, most notably the fact that we don't
> support UDTs. Looking at the javadoc for this function you are returing
> NULL for both class_name and data_type which doesn't look like it's
> allowed as type_cat and type_schem explicitly state their ability to be
> null. Without class_name and data_type what information are we really
> returning? If you are really just returning plain type info, how is this
> different/better than getTypeInfo().
>
> If you want to implement it for the sake of implementing it, the docs
> state, "Note: If the driver does not support UDTs, an empty result set is
> returned." I belive this is the correct thing to do.
>
> Kris Jurka
>
>
>
> !DSPAM:40a945e1239445479435263!
>
>
--
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 14675561