Re: Resolving 8.4 open items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Resolving 8.4 open items
Date: 2009-06-10 18:40:01
Message-ID: 10845.1244659201@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Tom,
>> I suspect there aren't many. What I'm more concerned about is that
>> people may have copied the bogus logic for use in their own datatypes.
>> (Which is exactly how Matthew Wakeling came to find out the problem.)
>> But in any case, this train is leaving the station.

> Can we put a warning in the README for both modules not to copy them as
> examples?

Seems a bit pointless unless we have a better example to offer instead.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-06-10 18:51:11 Re: pgindent run coming
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-06-10 18:37:19 Re: Resolving 8.4 open items