From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
Cc: | Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, Marco Colombo <pgsql(at)esiway(dot)net>, Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Delete/update with limit |
Date: | 2007-07-24 16:19:25 |
Message-ID: | 10839.1185293965@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> Unfortunately the stuff that makes a ctid=<value> nice doesn't seem to be
> used when you're doing an in.
Yeah, see the header comments in tidpath.c:
* There is currently no special support for joins involving CTID; in
* particular nothing corresponding to best_inner_indexscan(). Since it's
* not very useful to store TIDs of one table in another table, there
* doesn't seem to be enough use-case to justify adding a lot of code
* for that.
Of course, that argument is wrong for a self-join, which is what this
would essentially be. So maybe it would be worth doing sometime.
Still, the issue doesn't come up very often.
[ thinks for a bit ... ] Actually, you can do it as of 8.2 or so,
by abusing the ScalarArrayOp stuff: turn the subquery into an array.
An example in the regression database:
regression=# explain update tenk1 set ten=ten+1
regression-# where ctid = any (array(select ctid from tenk1 limit 10));
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tid Scan on tenk1 (cost=0.46..40.71 rows=10 width=250)
TID Cond: (ctid = ANY ($0))
InitPlan
-> Limit (cost=0.00..0.46 rows=10 width=6)
-> Seq Scan on tenk1 (cost=0.00..458.00 rows=10000 width=6)
(5 rows)
It even seems to get the cost estimate right...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-24 16:21:09 | Re: varchar does not work too well with IS NOT NULL partial indexes. |
Previous Message | Viatcheslav Kalinin | 2007-07-24 16:19:07 | Pattern matching with index |