Re: PITR Phase 2 - Design Planning

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PITR Phase 2 - Design Planning
Date: 2004-04-27 22:11:29
Message-ID: 1083103889.30065.110.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 17:36, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 21:56, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > > Overall, I'd refer back to the points Bruce raised - you certainly do
> > > need a way of finding out the time to recover to, and as others have
> > > said also, time isn't the only desirable "recovery point".
> >
> > Wouldn't it be sufficient to simply use the transaction ID and ensure
> > that all the parameters the user might want to use to find that ID can
> > be made available in the log files?

> Yes, of course, all methods of locating a particular xlog file to stop
> at are effectively equivalent. The discussion is mostly about what is
> convenient for the user in a real recovery situation.

I see.. The first thing I would need to do is look at /var/log/pgsql. At
that point it really doesn't matter what the identifier is so long as
the identifier is there.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-04-27 22:35:40 Re: PITR Phase 2 - Design Planning
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2004-04-27 21:36:29 Re: PITR Phase 2 - Design Planning