From: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: |
Date: | 2023-10-20 06:59:39 |
Message-ID: | 10825c6f2aff7e0c4db7fef45f4b25132b2735c1.camel@gunduz.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-pkg-yum |
Hi Guillaume,
On Thu, 2023-10-19 at 19:51 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> From rpm/redhat/15/postgresql-15/EL-9/postgresql-15.spec (and many
> other
> postgresql .spec files):
>
> # These file(s) should not be packaged:
>
> %{__rm} %{buildroot}%{pgbaseinstdir}/lib/libpgfeutils.a
>
> I'm wondering why this library shouldn't be packaged? It is definitely
> useful for front-end clients.
This is per Fedora packaging guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries
...though it is a "should not" item. OTOH, the same guideline if we says
we need to split those files under -static subpackage, which we don't
ship right now.
Just took a look at Fedora spec file, and they already ship these files
in -static subpackage (we ship them with -devel subpackage as of now)
libpgcommon.a
libpgcommon_shlib.a
libpgport.a
libpgport_shlib.a
but not libpgfeutils.a
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2023-10-20 12:43:42 | Re: |
Previous Message | Ulrych Tomáš | 2023-10-20 06:54:09 | Missing package for Red Hat on ppc64le |