Re: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Nick Barr <nicky(at)chuckie(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks
Date: 2004-04-21 12:22:29
Message-ID: 1082550148.80320.111.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 08:19, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > I realize that MySQL & PG cannot really be compared (especially when you
> > consider the issues that MySQL has with things like data integrity) but
> > still surely PG would perform better than the stats show (i.e. #7 31.28
> > seconds versus 42 minutes!!!).
>
> We know that PostgreSQL 7.5 will perform much better than 7.4 did due to
> the efforts of OSDN and Tom.

OSDL not OSDN.

> I've enquired as to whether they ran ANALYZE after the data load. They
> don't explicitly mention it, and given the mention it took 2.5days to
> load 1GB of data, they're not regular PostgreSQL users.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Thomas 2004-04-21 12:55:21 Re: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2004-04-21 12:19:21 Re: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks